ADA Expands Definition of "Disability" Increasing Wrongful Termination Suits

Due to the expanded definition of the term “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 employers have been receiving an increasing number of requests for reasonable accommodations under the ADA. Most commonly of these requests are leaves of absence or changes to the employees schedule. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and courts recognize that use of accrued paid leave or additional, unpaid time off from work may be a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

Employers have several ways to accommodate employee requests for time away from work. For example, they can allow the employee to use accrued paid-time-off benefits like paid vacation or sick time. The employee can use the unpaid Family and Medical Leave Act during while also using accrued paid-time-off benefits or receive payments to a disability or workers' compensation benefits plan at the same time. Or the employer can also provide paid or unpaid leave according to company policy. All of these efforts are usually viewed as a form of reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

Often, employers mistakenly believe that their accommodation obligation ends once these efforts have been exhausted. Recently, this mistaken belief has been challenged by the EEOC, and at a very high cost to employers.

In 2009 a retailer settled for $6.2 million after the EEOC challenged the company policy to terminate all employees that had not returned to work after 12 months of being out on disability due to workers compensation claims.

A national communications company also settled for $20million after the EEOC alleged they had violated the ADA by holding the employees accountable for all their absences due to their disabilities. The company would fire the employees for excessive absences even though those absences were directly related to their disability.

Recently a Grocery Store Chain also settled at $3.2million after the EEOC disputed the employer's policy to terminating employees at the end of a fixed medical leave period instead of allowing the employees to return to work with reasonable accommodations.

Lastly, the EEOC Challenged a national airline company regarding it's company policy to not issue reduced work schedules for any of the employees. Instead the company required employees to either take a leave of absence or to take early retirement. The company eventually settled as well.

In short, regardless of what your company policy is you may be entitled to further accommodation of your disability. If you have been terminated or being asked to resign due to your disability you should contact an experienced labor law attorney to examine your case.
 

If you have any questions about this article or our blog, feel free to call us at:

Long Beach – (562) 256-1047
Los Angeles – (213) 261-0229
San Francisco – (415) 200-0012 or (415) 230-2755
San Diego – (619) 342-1242 or (619) 272-2193

FACEBOOK: AN EMPLOYEE'S FRIEND OR FOE?

Network. Network. Network. That is the advice given by many job placement and career development organizations; therefore, the rise in popularity of networking websites is not surprising. The problem is that as networking has become high-tech, the line between an individual’s personal and professional life has become blurred. Traditional means of networking consisted of targeted letters and telephone calls and participation in appropriate trade organizations. There was no question that the information exchanged between the parties was professional and to be used for employment purposes. Today, more and more individuals are taking advantage of services provided by social networking websites including Facebook , Twitter, MySpace, and YouTube. Although designed for personal and social use, there are few legal safeguards against an employer accessing information on these sites when making employment decisions.

Employers will often screen job applicants by reviewing their profiles for information that may be damaging to the company’s reputation or subject it to future liability.  Some employees will also routinely monitor their current employees’ online activity for not only these reasons, but also for evidence of co-worker harassment or extent of online use during working hours. Despite the availability of privacy controls, information posted on social networking sites is designed to be shared and, therefore, individuals may not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy.”  This is especially true with respect to information created or accessed on a company computer. In general, there is no expectation of privacy on company property, because an employer has a right to view the contents of information contained on its computers. Furthermore, according to intellectual property lawyer, Catrin Turner, “If a social networking site is used to hold any information which relates to your employment, if that information is prepared in the course of your employment, you are dealing with company property.” 

While employers may be able to access personal information, there are some restrictions on the manner in which they obtain and use it in employment decisions. George Lenard has identified the following possible legal violations committed by employers:

1. Anti-Discrimination Laws

Employers are prohibited from making employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act), disability (Americans with Disabilities Act), or age (Age Discrimination in Employment Act). By accessing social networking sites, employers gain suspect classification information not normally obtained via an interview or resume. Thus, if an individual brings a discrimination claim, the employer cannot plead ignorance.
 

2. Invasion of Privacy

An employee may bring a tort claim for violation of privacy, but this is likely to be a weak claim. As previously mentioned, given the public nature of the sites it will be difficult to prove a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The claim may be stronger if the employer actually hacked into or otherwise bypassed a user’s privacy controls. Facebook’s Terms of Service specify that users must agree to“not solicit login information or access an account belonging to someone else.”  Furthermore, an employer who accesses information on a computer without authorization may be liable under the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1030).
 

3. Fair Credit Reporting Act

In addition to causes of action against the employer, third parties may also become liable for improperly accessing information on social networking sites. For instance, an employer could hire a third party to gain access to a potential employee’s account and then use that information to make an employment decision. If the employee had a “reasonable expectation of employment” and was not hired, the third party could be liable for tortuous interference of business expectancy. The third party could also be found in violation of the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) (15 U.S.C. 1831 et.seq. The FCRA requires credit check agencies to disclose that information it obtained was provided to an employer to be used in an employment decision. Lerner suggests that a similar law is needed to specifically cover information gained from networking sites. Facebook has taken some steps to limit the collection of information from its site by amending its Terms of Service to include the following statement: “If you collect information from users, you will: obtain their consent….and post a privacy policy explaining what information you collect and how you will use it.”

The existing laws offer some privacy protection, but if you are working or looking for work, you should take steps to insure that Facebook is your friend and not your foe.

Strategy:

1. Review your privacy settings
 

If you allow friends or networks access to your profile, you essentially waive all privacy rights as to those individuals. Be particularly wary of accepting your current supervisors and co-workers as “friends” as this will certainly bring your personal activities into the workplace.
 

2. Be judicious in your postings
 

Assume that all information you post on Facebook can and will be accessed by employers.Consequently, your goal should be to portray yourself in the best possible light. You can highlight your interest in or knowledge of a particular field by posting information on current issues; but, take care to avoid discriminatory or inflammatory comments.
 

3. Review your employer’s computer use policy

An increasing number of employers are drafting company policies regarding use of social networking sites. Provisions may include (1) restricted or prohibited access to networking sites on company computers, (2) an employer’s right to access sites, if it suspects activity that interferes with work performance, such as harassment of co-workers, and (3) prohibition of posting disparaging information about the employer.  Remember that company policies are considered legally binding contracts and may provide stiff penalties for violations, even termination.

4. Contact a California labor law attorney

If you suspect that you have been denied employment or wrongfully terminated on the basis of personal information, contact a knowledgeable California labor law attorney to discuss your rights.